Robert E. Howard's Conan
Many of my friends can attest to the numerous times i have extolled the grandeur of J.R.R. Tolkien's fantasy world. A world so rich in detail that if it's origins weren't known it could easily be mistaken for real myth - if you'll excuse the apparent contradiction. I'm a big user of the 5 level scale of magnitude and Tolkien's work qualifies as a 5 in terms of scope of imagination. It's an elite group who's few members include the likes of Frank Herbert and his Dune works, which again, i have many times expressed my deep awe of these two authors and the magnitude of their creations.
But, as the first line of this post was put there to keep me on task, this is about Howard's Conan. So often i forget about this entry my mental catalog of creative fiction, and i don't know why is should be so - it's an absolutely magnificent work. As intellectually underestimated as it's eponymous character perhaps. This probably stems from the several factors from it's inception in pulp media to it's introduction to the larger public as a movie starring a less than fluent Arnold Schwarzenegger (through no fault of his). If one of Tolkien's main undercurrents is the question of progress, then one of Howard's would be an even earlier question of civilization. Take for example the secondary sub-title 'the barbarian' (i believe the original sub-title was 'the Cimmarian') it is already suggesting that the main character is less-than-civilized, yet it is the myriad of background and supporting characters that are ill-mannered, corrupt, backwards, or down right evil - the very antithesis of what civilized is supposed to be.
Using the for mentioned scale Conan easily ranks a 4 in my book. The depth and range of the world of Hyboria is... well i guess the word would be fantastic. Howard's own description from his first book is, i think, one of the great passages in all of fantasy fiction:
"Know, O prince, that between the years when the oceans drank Atlantis and the gleaming cities, and the years of the rise of the sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of, when shining kingdoms lay spread across the world like blue mantles beneath the stars..."
It goes on to give the briefest, but none the less colorful, descriptions of many of the places in the world of Hyboria, that the reader will come to know and love. The passage also fixes the world in time, between the even more legendary 'Atlantis' and the earliest of 'modern' history - the Aryans, or early indo-europeans. So simple, yet like many things simple - utterly brilliant. It sets the whole mythos right on the edge of the what we know to be true and what we know to be untrue making it the easiest thing in the world not just to suspend your disbelief, but to throw it to the wind.
Perhaps another pseudo-device used is the one character. There is no group like the fellowship of the ring, or Dorthy and her various companions of L. Frank Baum's Oz, or the children of the Narnia. It is just Conan and the world itself, again this makes it so simple, actually it is the only choice, to focus on the character and his setting. Further there are no elves, no centaurs, no talking chickens to subconsciously accept as real. There are demons and 'gods' specifically and magic in general, but it is portrayed in a manner that extends readily from what the human subconscious already feels about such things, namely that it is mysterious, esoteric and extraordinary (despite the regularity with which Conan encounters such things :) ) and as such requires no additional justification or explanation beyond the initial acceptance. Finally, on the singularity of the character, i do so love it when something i enjoy is an 'arch-type', and with out actually doing the research i believe Conan is just that. If you see a 'barbarian' it is either of the Viking variety or the Conan variety and even then the line can be a little hazy (a testament the the readiness with which Conan's 'fiction' is placed on par with history's 'fact'). Can any other fantasy fiction boast this?
I don't know why i chose to come out of my blogging hibernation with this particular post, I guess i just didn't want to keep on forgetting about Howard's contribution, and perhaps even contribute in some minute way to the unveiling of his too unappreciated works, which i sincerely hope gets more attention in the future. I would certainly love to see a new movie, or even better trilogy, about Conan depicting him in truer form, because i think he is quite simply one of the most entertaining characters in the whole of fantasy fiction, and there is definitely enough to work from. (my vote for director would be Wolfgang Peterson - comments specifically welcome on this one :) ) In closing, if you liked Lord of the Rings and are looking for more good classic fantasy fiction i obviously recommend Conan, and if you are already familiar with any of the works, be it pulp mags, books, comics, animation, or movies I earnestly beg you to place your comments now for discussion.
P.S. Anybody remember the cartoon Thundarr the Barbarian? Hehehe, that is Grade-A nostalgia there.


Recent Comments